Thomas J Price

“Tom, what the fuck are you gonna do? You’re dyslexic, you can’t do maths, you don’t like taking orders and you argue all the time. So what are you going to do?” That’s what sculptor Thomas J Price asked himself in his teens. Born and raised on a council estate in pre-gentrification South London, he was determined to find a way to ensure he had options in life. This drive took him to study at the prestigious Chelsea College of Art and Royal College of Art.

img-thomas-price_144832550646

He’s tall, broad and imposing when you meet him, and animated and expressive in conversation. In 2001, while at college, Price decided to lick his entire gallery wall to create a piece of work that couldn’t be seen. “Licked” got a lot of attention – he misjudged the scale of the task, and wore the top layer of his tongue off, leaving increasingly grisly blood smears as he reached his goal.

“Network”, his 2013 sculpture of a nine-foot, ‘young black male’ simply checking his phone caused a reaction as it could be seen to be a ‘rioter’. “If you look at all the sculptures of people out there I wanted to do the inverse of the norm,” he says. “Which is a middle-aged, rich white man looking imperious who could embody the empire because often they’d been involved in atrocious things overseas – yet I can’t even do an image of a young black guy because it’s deemed controversial.” After the initial horror, the work cemented Price as one of the UK’s most exciting artists and has been exhibited at the prestigious Yorkshire Sculpture Park (recently home to KAWS’ first UK museum exhibition) and The Line, London’s new sculpture walk.

His latest work, Worship, features three enormous aluminium heads resting atop marble plinths at London’s Hales Gallery. They reflect his new exploration of the Greek, Roman and Egyptian styles but flashes us forward with the futuristic material highlighting the throwaway nature of todays technology.


Being a sculptor isn’t a usual aspiration for a young man from a poor part of London.
I originally wanted to be a physiotherapist. I’ve always had an interest in hands and bodies but I was so shit at keeping up in class at college, I just couldn’t do it. My best mate was doing art and the teacher loved him so he talked me on to the course – I showed a picture I’d drawn of my cat when I was 13 and they said OK. When I started to zone in on what my ‘thing’ might be, I realized I was interested in psychology, sensation, experience and shared experience. “Licked” came from that. I was allowed the freedom I’d always craved and I didn’t have to answer to anyone. By the time I’d got to do my BA, I’d won the college art prize and had already been designing stuff for the Turbine Hall. I designed a slide, which ended up getting in there and a moving floor.

And you chose sculpture rather than licking everything?
“Licked” was so popular that I started thinking of loads of things that I could do. There was another guy doing performance and I didn’t really like the way the work was connecting with people. I thought that I couldn’t really be doing that; I’d have to get more and more extreme. I looked back at the essentials of what my work was about and figured that performance wasn’t it. I was still into psychology, the rhythm of synapses firing, pulses, sound, the conscious and unconscious, and subliminal. I started looking at the reactions of people, I went back to try and decipher human cues and to distill that. I’ve always been interested in animating rooms – licking a room is a bit like trying to animate it. 

You’d imagine a career advisor would suggest the army for a dyslexic youth from inner city London.
[laughing] At 18 I actually decided to join the Royal Marines; it’s shocking how close I came to joining, I could see how upset my mum was at that prospect; I went to quite a posh school that I’d got into on a scholarship and the people who went to that school were the types who’d go into government. I didn’t want them to be the ones to tell me go and kill people. I said to my mum that I’d do a Foundation Course in art first and as soon as I got onto it I loved it, there were no real limits on what you could do.

You lived on a council estate but went to a posh school and then the Royal College of Art. Did you ever have a crisis about your identity?
I lived my whole life between worlds where the income was low and working class and the interest and ideals very much middle-class because of the arts. The arts bring you into contact with all sorts of people – paupers and kings and queens. Perhaps that’s another reason I was drawn to it – it’s a social cloak that you can put on and be whoever you want to be. When I was growing up I didn’t know what I wanted to do but I knew that I wanted to have a choice. It was an obsessive drive for me; I decided when I was 11 that I would try and go to a private school via an assisted place scholarship scheme. I thought that was the way to get on; that was how to give yourself options. Luckily I got in and they paid for my fees. It was great; proper old school – think Tom Brown’s Schooldays! It was quite tricky going to a school full of wealthy people and being basically broke all the time, knowing that I didn’t have the safety net they did. I had no financial security, I had nothing. 

I always say those people have a ‘cash mattress’ to fall back on.
Exactly! Imagine the socializing – at school I’d be with those people and then where I lived would be people from the other end of the spectrum. Some people at home were quite happy doing what they were doing and where they were living but I wanted to get on – I just wanted to give myself this chance that I thought was going to save me, I don’t know what from! Going to art school was a revelation in a sense that there was less diversity, something that’s even more so today – it’s scary. Art does seem to be the pursuit of the rich at the moment, how else could you fund yourself through college?

It’s hard enough being a young black male today, but let alone being a young black sculptor, have you found it harder? Naomi Campbell recently said she had to be twice as good because she was black.
You’ve got to be on it, you’ve got to be on your game – there are so many hidden barriers.

I’m a middle class white guy so you’re talking about things I probably wouldn’t think of.
Exactly. I’ve spent my whole life running up against them and barrier by barrier, trying to remove or dismantle them. Sometimes you just have to go around them, because it takes a lot of energy. That’s where the twice as good Naomi Campbell talks about comes in. It’s not necessarily that you have to be better, but it’s all the other things that you have to do as well. The horrible situation is you can barely even mention it as then you’re seen to be complaining or that your work just becomes about that and then you get pigeon-holed. I also think people don’t want to hear it; they don’t think they’re racist and they don’t want to be confronted. I think that’s what I want my work to do, to confront people but in a way which is quite seductive and lets them feel like they might be in control for a little bit.

What is it about heads and faces? You sculpt them, you used your own face to lick a room, you’ve made animated heads, is the face the essence of who a person is?
It’s the site of communication, it’s the first thing that people go to and it contains so much. I come to this from a very conceptual angle. Whereas a portrait artist or a traditional figurative sculptor would be trying to render the person to the best of their ability, I wanted to know how, most efficiently, could I get inside someone’s head and try and communicate an attitude to them. What I basically make are psychological propositions. I’d done all this video stuff and been to art schools and knew all the speak and theory, but what it came to was the human face and form was the most efficient tool for me to ask these questions and get people in the right mindset. I then started looking at more formal aspects of sculpture but only as a way for me to control the effect.

With “Worship” the eyes have a middle distance stare, which is hard to engage with.
They’re not blankly staring; I always talk about them being self-contained. They’re not looking to engage or for validation, they exist whether or not the viewer is there. They look beyond the viewer. These heads for Worship have scooped out eyes, which gives a psychological space for the viewer to fill. The aluminium finish gives a shadow in the eyes and it looks like a void – a window to the soul or psyche. Rather than being based on the individualism of Roman portraiture, these are based on the idealism of Greek but with a lot more Egyptian – you can see the slightly serene look on their faces – very tricky to do without them looking moronic! They’re supposed to be based on a quite a formal Egyptian deity sculpture. I guess it is monumentalism but taking the ancient rather than the classical. 

You’ve taken ancient ideas and then realised them in aluminium, which is one of the most futuristic and ephemeral materials.
I really wanted to connect the idea of the future and technology, and with the ephemeral nature of things like phones. They’re metal and aluminium but you still throw that shit away, it’s good for a while, you try and communicate with it, you look at the face of the phone and then chuck it. I wanted to bring all those elements together and try and make an object that alluded to all those things and not just be a one-liner, but more of a layered, subtle thing that would last a bit longer.

It’s quite a solitary thing sculpting…
[laughing] I have no friends.

So do you literally make your own friends and give your pieces personalities?
Because I’ve come to this from a psychological side of things, these are about attitudes or perceptions. They draw opinion in or they project questions. They’re not really people to me, I call them characters quite a lot but only because that’s an easier way to get people to understand what I’m trying to do. Characters are fictional in my mind, we create them, so I never feel that they are people to talk to. Although when I’m making them I get them to a point where I feel they could be alive and that’s very important. When I’m close to it I suddenly feel like they just moved or breathed. When I get to that point I basically tidy it up and I leave it. I want them to be convincing enough for people to connect with and invest emotion, ideas or delve into their psyches and therefore bring more of themselves into it so there’s an exchange between them. 

Some people don’t like the act of showing their work as they’ve spent so much time with it. I’m guessing you’re not bothered about that?
Maybe it’s just me, but it’s a conversation. I love showing the work, even though it’s quite scary and very vulnerable – you’re incredibly exposed. I don’t believe people that say, “it’s not about showing work, these are all my ideas, I really believe in this and I’ve put a lot of time and money into it. I don’t care what you think…” Of course you care what they think! I really fucking care!

Photo: Dan Wilton

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s